• Home
  • Current Issue
  • About Us
  • Archives
  • Advertising
  • PBK
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe


Current Issue

Search Tips

Wrap search phrases within double quotes ("...")

To sign up for our monthly e-newsletter, enter your e-mail address
Become a fan of The American Scholar on Facebook Follow us on Twitter
Click here for our Barnes & Noble Reader Offer
Subscribe to The American Scholar.

Just Posted

Paul Muldoon's 19th-century
circus fantasia

Point of Departure

Noel Polk recalls his father's desire to get off the farm

Web Exclusives

  • Bob Thompson on covering the "book beat" and how to write about writers
  • Archives

From Past Issues

  • William Zinsser on
    how Woody Allen
    made him ugly
  • Steven L. Isenberg's "Lunching on Olympus," a Best American Essays 2010 selection
  • William Deresiewicz on the disadvantages of an elite education
  • James McConkey on fathers and sons
  • Melvin Bukiet takes aim at Brooklyn Books of Wonder
  • Emily Bernard
    on teaching
    "the N-Word”

Tell Us What You Think

E-mail us at scholar@pbk.org.

Print This Page Print This Page
William Zissner

Zinsser on Friday

A weekly posting about writing, the arts, and popular culture by William Zinsser, author of On Writing Well, based on a favorite quotation or comment.

Zinsser on Friday

Life and Work

By William Zinsser

“What is there in life if you do not work? There is only sensation, and there are only a few sensations–you cannot live on them. You can only live on work, by work, through work. How can you live with self-respect if you do not do things as well as lies in you?”

So said the opera diva Maria Callas in an interview that I clipped from the London Observer in 1970. Unlike Callas, I can’t hit a high C. But on the subject of work she and I are buddies. I’ve never defined myself as a writer, or, God forbid, an author. I’m a person–someone who goes to work every morning, like the plumber or the television repairman, and who goes home at the end of the day to think about other things. I can’t imagine not going to work as long as I can.

I’ve never been–perhaps to my shame–a citizen of writing. I don’t belong to writers’ organizations, or attend writers’ talks and panels, or lunch with publishing potentates. I don’t hang out with writers. Writers tend to be not as interesting as they think. What they mainly want to talk about is their own writing, and they also have a ton of grievances, their conversation quick to alight on the perfidy of publishers, the lassitude of editors and agents, and the myopia of critics who reviewed–or didn’t review–their last book.

I’m a lone craftsman, not unlike a potter or a cabinetmaker, shaping and reshaping my materials to create an object that pleases me–nobody else–and when it’s done I send it forth into the world. I don’t have an agent. I never show my writing to other writers; their agenda is not my agenda. For the objective judgment and emotional support that every writer needs I depend on the individual editors of my books and magazine articles–fellow craftsmen–and on a few trusted friends.

Many younger writers have taken me as a mentor, and when they come to New York they drop in for a checkup. Far too often I find them dispirited and professionally adrift, worn down by the glacial machinery of trying to get published: waiting for the phone call that doesn’t get returned and for the check that isn’t in the mail and for the decision on a manuscript that the publisher can’t find (“I’ve been traveling a lot lately and I guess it got put in the wrong pile”), revising their article yet again for yet another editor who knows a great angle to satisfy the “marketing people,” as did the two previous editors, now gone to other jobs without letting their authors know. Writers are one of nature’s most insecure species; they shouldn’t be in thrall to an industry so dysfunctional and discourteous. They should be writing what they want to write, not what their handlers tell them to write.

I try to refocus my frazzled writers on the process of writing, not the product. If the process is sound, the product will take care of itself. Recently I got a letter from a young woman writer who was back home in California after her annual visit. She said, “Your office is a sanctuary of craft amidst the hullabaloo of publishers, editors, and agents. You have no idea how liberating that is.”

It may seem perverse that I compare my writing to plumbing, an occupation not regarded as high-end. But to me all work is equally honorable, all crafts an astonishment when they are performed with skill and self-respect. Just as I go to work every day with my tools, which are words, the plumber arrives with his kit of wrenches and washers, and afterward the pipes have been so adroitly fitted together that they don’t leak. I don’t want any of my sentences to leak. The fact that someone can make water come out of a faucet on the 10th floor strikes me as a feat no less remarkable than the construction of a clear declarative sentence.

Tagged in: Maria Callas, William Zinsser, Zinsser on Friday

William Zinsser is the author of 18 books, including On Writing Well. To read his weekly posting, Zinsser on Friday, click here.

9 Responses to “Life and Work”

  1. computemeghadoot says:
    June 18, 2010 at 8:49 am

    Well put! Work is indeed worship and something that makes life worth the while.

  2. Sandy Mesmer says:
    June 18, 2010 at 5:45 pm

    Work is indeed a privelege; the real glory is in the journey. Achieving is fun but would be worthless without the road before it. Thanks for reminding me!

  3. Shoes Red says:
    June 18, 2010 at 10:48 pm

    This really is my first time i visit right here. I found so numerous interesting stuff inside your weblog especially its discussion. From the tons of comments on your articles, I guess I’m not the only one having all the enjoyment right here! keep up the good function.

  4. Stan Carey says:
    June 19, 2010 at 9:32 am

    I like the description “sanctuary of craft”: it conveys much with great economy. There seems to be an ever-swelling emphasis on the apparatus of writing and publishing — a fixation on the business instead of the graft and occasional magic the industry depends upon.

  5. Karl Kelley says:
    June 20, 2010 at 12:11 pm

    Decimated by the current economy, my employer laid me off three days ago. I spent forty years working at technical jobs that I was merely “fond of”. The layoff gave me the opportunity to pursue what I have always “loved” – writing. At 62, I must not squander this opportunity. Zinsser’s On Writing Well was the first book I purchased to improve (create?) my writing skill. The most important thing I learned from Zinsser is to write for myself – something I seem to have always known, but haven’t been able to put into practice. I am thrilled to find Zinsser on Friday and hope to spend many more Fridays learning from him.

  6. Brian says:
    June 22, 2010 at 12:15 am

    I’ve been fascinated with the beauty of well written memoir for over 30 years. Zinsser’s On Writing Well and Writing Memoir have guided my understanding of the craft. I agree with Karl – and wish him well in his own writing – that it is a thrill to have just discovered Zinsser on Friday.

  7. Best Jobs To Meet Women says:
    June 27, 2010 at 2:41 am

    Very neat blog post. Want more.

  8. Ashty Hamaamin says:
    July 1, 2010 at 10:34 am

    I love what Zinsser has to say about life and work. Self-worth,self-respect, and self-love all comes from what one decides for themselves how they best can define their work to become. Within each profession a man will need the appropriate energy, tools and skills to continue their desire to work. This site has got my attention as I really do agree on what Zinsser has to say.

  9. Eroteme says:
    July 8, 2010 at 12:18 am

    I enjoyed reading this article. However, just to offer another perspective which (could) stamps out the politically correct thought of “all work is equally honourable” – I don’t think all work is equally honourable. A piece of work is honourable only to an individual and hence, making it a blanket “matter-of-honour” seems like an attempt at pacifying all and sundry. I would not consider investment banking honourable or picking garbage. Not on account of anything implicit in them but because they do not rouse in me a sense of worth which is the face of my capabilities and spirit. I might consider cabinet making honourable but others need not. I think the respectability of a piece of work comes from the person who enjoys it or understands it. I cannot expect everyone to understand what I do and hence, when they say “all work is equally honourable” I just roll my eyes and continue humming while I work.

|

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

This article is copyrighted by the author. It may not be reproduced without permission of the publisher. For reproduction or distribution rights, please contact scholar@pbk.org.

Become a fan of The American Scholar on Facebook Follow us on Twitter

Copyright ©2010 The American Scholar. All rights reserved.




  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • About Us
  • Archives
  • Advertising
  • PBK
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe